Oscars: The Case of Felicity Jones in The Brutalist

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten Best Picture contenders and now alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five races. The BP nominee posts are up and they’re readily available for your perusing pleasure. Today is our third entry in Best Supporting Actress and that’s Felicity Jones in Brady Corbet’s The Brutalist. If you missed my posts covering Monica Barbaro (A Complete Unknown) and Ariana Grande from Wicked, they’re linked at the bottom.

Previous Acting Oscar Nominations:

Best Actress (2014, The Theory of Everything) – lost to Julianne Moore (Still Alice)

The Case for Felicity Jones:

A decade after contending in lead actress for The Theory of Everything, Jones gets her second Academy try in the picture tied for the second most nominations. She also received mentions at BAFTA and the Golden Globes.

The Case Against Felicity Jones:

Jones was not nominated at Critics Choice or SAG and nearly all chatter of an actor winning for The Brutalist has focused on Adrien Brody in Best Actor. Zoe Saldaña (Emilia Pérez) has swept the season so far and with SAG the only precursor left, Jones has no chance of picking up any hardware before the big show.

The Verdict:

It was a question mark as to whether Jones would make the final five. It’s an honor to be nominated.

My Case Of posts will continue with the third hopeful in Supporting Actor and that’s Edward Norton in A Complete Unknown…

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.