Oscars: The Case of Ralph Fiennes in Conclave

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten Best Picture contenders and now alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five races. The BP nominee posts are up and they’re readily available for your perusing pleasure. Today is our fourth entry in Best Actor and that’s Ralph Fiennes in Edward Berger’s Conclave. If you missed my posts covering the first three thespians, they’re linked at the bottom.

Previous Acting Oscar Nominations:

Best Supporting Actor (1993, Schindler’s List) – lost to Tommy Lee Jones (The Fugitive)

Best Actor (1996, The English Patient) – lost to Geoffrey Rush (Shine)

The Case for Ralph Fiennes:

For his third nomination and first in nearly 30 years, his work as Cardinal Thomas Lawrence in the papal thriller earned Fiennes lead actor nods at the Globes, BAFTA, SAG, and Critics Choice. The Academy could consider this a lifetime achievement prize after three decades of well-received performances in pics both large and small.

The Case Against Ralph Fiennes:

Adrien Brody (The Brutalist) has swept the season thus far with Timothée Chalamet (A Complete Unknown) generally seen as the runner-up. Conclave took Best Film at BAFTA and if Fiennes couldn’t emerge there, it’s tough to see him winning anywhere.

The Verdict:

I wouldn’t look for Fiennes to be the selection and the third time won’t be the charm.

My Case Of posts will continue with our fourth hopeful in Supporting Actress and that’s Conclave costar Isabella Rossellini…

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.