Ahead of its Friday release, the embargo has lapsed for the eagerly awaited sequel Wicked: For Good and we are seeing just how popular or unpopular it is with critics. Jon M. Chu returns to direct alongside the cast of Cynthia Erivo, Ariana Grande, Jonathan Bailey, Ethan Slater, Bowen Yang, Marissa Bode, Michelle Yeoh, and Jeff Goldblum.

Based on the Broadway phenomenon, Good is expected to generate massive box office dollars. Will it be able to match or exceed the Oscar performance of its predecessor from last year? At the 97th Academy Awards, Wicked picked up 10 nominations – Best Picture, Actress (Erivo), Supporting Actress (Grande), Costume Design, Film Editing, Makeup and Hairstyling, Original Score, Production Design, Sound, and Visual Effects. It won for Costume Design and Production Design.

We’ll get into all those in a second, but let’s start with the headline. As one of the final pieces to this grand awards puzzle, Good‘s reviews aren’t as strong as part 1’s. 2024’s original had 88% on Rotten Tomatoes and 73 on Metacritic. At the time of publication, RT for Good is 71% with Metacritic at 61.

In short, that makes its prospects murkier in most categories starting with BP. On Sunday when I posted my latest update, I dropped the follow-up from 6th to 8th in that race. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it slide further in my next update and I certainly don’t expect it to go up. Anywhere from 8-10 seems reasonable with the possibility that it could miss the cut. A Directing nod for Chu appears out of reach.

Since April when I did my first projections, I’ve had Erivo and Grande getting back to back noms as the Wicked Witch and Glinda the Good. That’s likely to continue though I’m less confident that they’re both slam dunk inclusions. Actress is crowded and Erivo faces tough competition. I think Grande in Supporting Actress is safer. She was probably runner-up for the victory last year when she fell short to Zoe Saldaña in Emilia Pérez. Grande has been ranked 1st for months on this blog and I still believe she could make the podium walk. The mixed overall reaction opens up victory narratives for others, including Teyana Taylor in One Battle After Another, Elle Fanning or Inga Ibsdotter Lilleass in Sentimental Value, and maybe even Amy Madigan for Weapons (though I’ve yet to predict her).

As for the tech races, Costume Design, Makeup and Hairstyling, and Production Design are close to shoo-in noms. I’m a little less assured about Sound and Visual Effects and far less so for Film Editing and Original Score.

Then there’s categories where the second helping of Wicked could pop up where Wicked did not. That includes original song. Universal is submitting “The Girl in the Bubble” and “No Place Like Home” for the tune derby. I included both in my quintet on Sunday. Some critical reaction indicates the new songs (in other words – not in the Broadway show) are not standouts. I still think one gets in (“Bubble”) but you never know.

The 98th Academy Awards marks the first year for the Best Casting prize. Had this existed last year, Wicked would have had 11 mentions instead of 10. Like most other races mentioned above, For Good making this list of five (or ten in BP) in tenuous.

Bottom line – the range of nominations for Wicked: For Good could be anywhere from 3 to maybe matching the 10 of Wicked in a best case scenario. My Oscar Prediction posts will continue…