Oscars: The Case of A Complete Unknown

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It begins with the ten BP contenders and then alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five races. I’ve already covered Anora and The Brutalist for BP and if you missed those, they are linked at the bottom of the post. Our third hopeful is A Complete Unknown.

The Case for A Complete Unknown:

If you want to bet on the picture with some late breaking momentum, the Bob Dylan biopic from James Mangold might be your horse. Released in December, Unknown is doing healthy business at the box office and scored 8 total noms that include Director, Actor (Timothée Chalamet), Supporting Actress (Monica Barbaro), Supporting Actor (Edward Norton), Adapted Screenplay, Costume Design, and Sound. The journey to the better than expected nomination count began with over performances at the precursors. It really hasn’t missed anywhere with a Best Ensemble mention at SAG and BP noms at the Golden Globes, PGA, Critics Choice, BAFTA, and a DGA slot for Mangold.

The Case Against A Complete Unknown:

It didn’t win the Golden Globe in Drama (that went to The Brutalist). The 80% RT score and 71 Metacritic are below most of its competitors. There’s even a chance that it goes 0 for 8 on Oscar night. I wouldn’t say it is the favorite in any category.

The Verdict:

I don’t think it’s impossible for this to take the top prize, but I would need to see some victories at upcoming precursors such as Critics Choice or SAG.

My Case Of posts will continue with Conclave

Oscars: The Case of The Brutalist

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It begins with the ten BP contenders and then alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five races. I’ve already covered Anora and if you missed that, it is linked at the bottom of the post. Our second contestant is Brady Corbet’s The Brutalist.

The Case for The Brutalist:

With the exception of SAG (where it wasn’t really expected to be a strong contender for Best Ensemble), the 215 minute epic immigration period piece has landed everywhere else. This includes BAFTA, PGA, Critics Choice, and DGA. The Golden Globe performance was particularly notable as it flexed its muscle with a Best Drama victory over competitors including A Complete Unknown and Conclave. Corbet took Director and Adrien Brody won Actor. The ten nominations are tied for 2nd best with Wicked. In addition to Pic, Corbet, and Brody, there are noms in Supporting Actress and Actor (Felicity Jones and Guy Pearce), Original Screenplay, Cinematography, Film Editing, Original Score, and Production Design. The timely subject matter doesn’t hurt. Critical appreciation is present with 93% on RT and a 90 Metacritic.

The Case Against The Brutalist:

Due to its runtime and subject matter, The Brutalist will not be as widely seen as some other options. Voters may want to go for something more popular and known. There’s been some subpar showings like at SAG where Pearce and Jones missed.

The Verdict:

I’ve had The Brutalist ranked in my top spot for months. It could take Director + Actor + some down the line competitions. That’s a solid mix for BP victory. However, this is a soft top ranking as half the field has BP winning potential.

My Case Of posts will continue with A Complete Unknown

Oscars: The Case of Anora

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

I will begin with the ten BP contenders and then alternate alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five big races. Sean Baker’s Anora kicks it off!

The Case for Anora:

The dramedy from auteur Sean Baker has turned out to be his awards breakout. Nominations wise it has landed everywhere it needed to in the precursors. This includes the Golden Globes with 5 nods as well as DGA, SAG, PGA, Critics Choice, and BAFTA. With a 93% Rotten Tomatoes meter and 91 on Metacritic, it sports five other Academy mentions and Mikey Madison is a threat to win Best Actress. It is likely the frontrunner for Original Screenplay. The other three noms are for Baker’s direction, Yura Borisov in Supporting Actor, and Film Editing.

The Case Against Anora:

Anora surprisingly went 0 for 5 at the Oscars. In Best Musical or Comedy, it fell short to Emilia Pérez with Demi Moore (The Substance) emerging over Madison in Actress while Conclave took Screenplay. From a genre and content standpoint, it’s not your “typical” BP recipient.

The Verdict:

There is no doubt that a narrative exists where Anora could take the top prize. That especially holds true if it gets the combo of Actress + Original Screenplay. Yet I’ve never had Anora ranked 1st in my BP forecast while others have and I’m skeptical that’ll change.

My Case Of posts will continue with The Brutalist

Oscars: The Case of Justine Triet for Anatomy of a Fall

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the five other big races. Today we arrive at our fifth filmmaker in Best Director and that’s Justine Triet in Anatomy of a Fall. Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Directing Nominations:

None

The Case for Justine Triet:

The buzz for French legal drama Anatomy of a Fall started building when it won the Palme d’Or at Cannes last summer and culminated with five nominations, including BP. Triet nabbed a BAFTA nod as well.

The Case Against Justine Triet:

No DGA, Globe, or Critics Choice nomination. France also dropped the ball by not submitting Anatomy of a Fall as their International Film Feature pick (voters might’ve wanted to make up for that by honoring Triet with a slot in this race). As with any of the other four contenders in Director, they’re not named Christopher Nolan. He’s taken every precursor that counts for Oppenheimer.

The Verdict:

Triet could be an Oscar recipient a week from now… in Original Screenplay alongside her cowriter Arthur Harari.

My Case Of posts have concluded! Whew. That means my FINAL Oscar predictions are coming to the blog in short order…

Oscars: The Case of Mark Ruffalo in Poor Things

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the five other big races. Today we arrive at our fifth performer in Best Supporting Actor and that’s Mark Ruffalo in Poor Things . Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Acting Nominations:

The Kids Are All Right (Supporting Actor, 2010); Foxcatcher (Supporting Actor, 2014); Spotlight (Supporting Actor, 2015)

The Case for Mark Ruffalo:

For his role as a true louse in Yorgos Lanthimos’s Poor Things, Ruffalo notched his fourth bid in Supporting Actor and perhaps voters will feel he’s overdue. He doesn’t have to worry about splitting votes with Willem Dafoe (his costar who was omitted) and he received noms at the Globes and Critics Choice.

The Case Against Mark Ruffalo:

He did not receive mentions at key precursors SAG and BAFTA. His leading lady Emma Stone is receiving the only potential winner buzz. Most importantly, Ruffalo’s fellow Avenger Robert Downey Jr. (Oppenheimer) has taken all the trophies at preceding ceremonies.

The Verdict:

It’s Iron Man and not Hulk happening here.

My Case Of posts will conclude (!) with Justine Triet’s direction for Anatomy of a Fall…

Oscars: The Case of Da’Vine Joy Randolph in The Holdovers

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the five other big races. Today we arrive at our fifth performer in Best Supporting Actress and that’s Da’Vine Joy Randolph in The Holdovers . Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Acting Nominations:

None

The Case for Da’Vine Joy Randolph:

It’s significant. After capturing the attention of many critics and moviegoers in 2019’s Dolemite Is My Name, Randolph has had a sterling precursor season by sweeping at the Globes, SAG, BAFTA, and Critics Choice. Heck, she even picked up the Indie Spirit Award for good measure in Alexander Payne’s acclaimed dramedy.

The Case Against Da’Vine Joy Randolph:

I’m struggling to come up with one. Randolph has won everywhere she needs to and no other rival emerged as a threat. I suppose if Oppenheimer greatly exceeds expectations, Emily Blunt could benefit from it. However, that hasn’t played out anywhere including BAFTA (where some suspected she could be a surprise recipient).

The Verdict:

Randolph will be holding an Oscar in the building come March 10th.

My Case Of posts will continue with Mark Ruffalo in Poor Things…


Oscars: The Case of Jeffrey Wright in American Fiction

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the five other big races. Today we arrive at our fifth performer in Best Actor and that’s Jeffrey Wright in American Fiction. Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Acting Nominations:

None

The Case for Jeffrey Wright:

The veteran thespian and Tony and Emmy winner for Angels in America finally gets into the Academy’s mix with Cord Jefferson’s dramedy. The Globes, SAG, and Critics Choice all included him. The film itself easily matched expectations with 5 nods (including for Wright’s costar Sterling K. Brown) and it could get honored somewhere.

The Case Against Jeffrey Wright:

That somewhere is likely to be in Adapted Screenplay and not Best Actor where Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is favored with Paul Giamatti (The Holdovers) as runner-up. BAFTA didn’t bite and he won none of the precursors.

The Verdict:

You’d be wrong to bet on Wright.

My Case Of posts will continue with Da’Vine Joy Randolph in The Holdovers…

Oscars: The Case of Emma Stone in Poor Things

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the five other big races. Today we arrive at our fifth performer in Best Actress and that’s Emma Stone in Poor Things. Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Acting Nominations:

Birdman (Supporting Actress, 2014); La La Land (Actress, 2016, WON); The Favourite (Supporting Actress, 2019)

The Case for Emma Stone:

Stone has posted significant wins this season with the Globes for Musical/Comedy, BAFTA, and Critics Choice. As Bella in Yorgos Lanthimos’s latest multi-genre concoction, she leads the picture with the second most overall nominations after Oppenheimer.

The Case Against Emma Stone:

Lily Gladstone (Killers of the Flower Moon) has key victories of her own at the Globes (Drama) and, most notably, SAG last weekend. Voters may opt to honor her in what would be a history making win over Stone’s second statue in seven years.

The Verdict:

This appears to be the one acting derby coming down to the wire. Between Stone and Gladstone, I’ll be pondering it all the way to final predictions in the coming days.

My Case Of posts will continue with Jeffrey Wright in American Fiction…

Oscars: The Case of Martin Scorsese for Killers of the Flower Moon

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five big races. Today we arrive at our fourth filmmaker in Best Director and that’s Martin Scorsese in Killers of the Flower Moon. Let’s get to it!

Previous Directing Oscar Nominations:

Raging Bull (1980); The Last Temptation of Christ (1988); GoodFellas (1990); Gangs of New York (2002); The Aviator (2004); The Departed (2006, WON); Hugo (2011); The Wolf of Wall Street (2013); The Irishman (2019)

The Case for Martin Scorsese:

Being one of the most celebrated directors in the history of the medium helps. For this epic historical drama, Scorsese nabs a 10th nod for his behind the camera work (moving ahead of Steven Spielberg’s 9). That’s second only to William Wyler’s 12. DGA, Globe, and Critics Choice mentions preceded this.

The Case Against Martin Scorsese:

It’s Christopher Nolan’s year as Oppenheimer glides to a BP crowning. That should easily correlate to this race. Scorsese also missed the BAFTA cut.

The Verdict:

The stats will be 1 for 10 for Marty when it comes to victories as Nolan is taking this.

My Case Of posts will continue with Emma Stone in Poor Things…

Oscars: The Case of Ryan Gosling in Barbie

As we do every year on this here blog, Oscar nominations lead to my Case Of series. What are they? Glad you asked. These are 35 posts covering the nominees for Picture, Director, and the four acting contests. For each one, I give you the case for the movie/director/actor winning and the case against it with a verdict tidying it up. It’s like a trial, but no one goes to prison.

It began with the ten BP contenders and now it alternates alphabetically between the hopefuls in the other five big races. Today we arrive at our fourth performer in Best Supporting Actor and that’s Ryan Gosling in Barbie. Let’s get to it!

Previous Oscar Acting Nominations:

Half Nelson (Actor, 2006); La La Land (Actor, 2016)

The Case for Ryan Gosling:

For his third nomination and first in the supporting field, Gosling has been mentioned everywhere that counts (Globes, SAG, BAFTA, Critics Choice). His show stopping performance of “I’m Just Ken” was a highlight of the year’s biggest blockbuster.

The Case Against Ryan Gosling:

He’s lost all of those precursors to Robert Downey Jr. in Oppenheimer. It’s also rare for comedic performances to get victories in any of the acting derbies. Barbie underperformed a tad with omissions for Margot Robbie and director Greta Gerwig (though America Ferrera made the cut).

The Verdict:

I’m just saying Downey Jr. is looking solid for gold. Gosling might be runner-up, but distantly.

My Case Of posts will continue with Martin Scorsese’s direction in Killers of the Flower Moon…