Most Comedy Sequels Really Suck

In case there is any ambiguity about the premise of this particular blog post, it’s that most sequels to comedies really suck. Seriously. Quickly think of a comedy sequel that’s better than the original… not easy. There are examples and we’ll get to those later, but the vast majority of the time, it doesn’t work.

Why? This explanation might encompass the answer to most: most comedies aren’t made with a sequel or sequels in mind. While countless action films, superhero sagas, and sci-fi pics are made with “franchise” on the brain, this is rarely the case for comedies. Most comedy sequels come as an afterthought, after the original has made boatloads of money (unexpectedly in many cases).

Some of the very worst offenders involve comedy sequels where certain principal cast members didn’t even bother to come back. I give you Teen Wolf Too, released two years after the original where a young Jason Bateman took over the role for Michael J. Fox (who probably knew much better). The original made $33 million in 1985… the sequel made $7 million. And it’s awful.

There is not one, not two, but THREE examples of sequels to Jim Carrey comedies in which Mr. Carrey wisely did not return. There’s Son of the Mask, which tried and failed to keep that franchise going. Carrey’s Mask earned $119 million. The other one: $17 million.

New Line also tried to keep the saga of Lloyd and Harry going in Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd by casting the characters in their youth. Bad idea. Carrey’s movie: $127 million. The other one: $26 million.

And then there’s Evan Almighty, the sequel to Bruce Almighty, where Steve Carell took over. The film was expected to be a hit and had a huge budget, but it underperformed. Carrey’s movie: $242 million. The other one: $100 million. Not terrible, but well below expectations.

Of course, Carrey isn’t totally innocent. The sequel to 1994’s Ace Ventura: Pet Detective that came a year later, Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls, is pretty lame. Though it did well at the box office.

One of the most notoriously bad comedy sequels: Caddyshack II. Coming eight years after the classic original, only Chevy Chase bothered to make a return appearance. Bill Murray and Rodney Dangerfield knew better. In 1980, Caddyshack made $39 million. The sequel only managed $11 million. And I’m going to go ahead and assume you don’t go around often quoting lines from the sequel.

Chevy Chase would further offend with Fletch Lives, a vastly subpar sequel to the 1985 film. Original: $50 million. Sequel: $35 million. It tries hard to replicate the original’s charm. It doesn’t.

While we’re talking 80s comedy sequels, 1984’s Police Academy wasn’t that great in the first place, but it was a hit and spawned a LOT of sequels that pretty much suck equally. Even Steve Guttenberg knew to leave the franchise after a couple of them. That didn’t stop him, however, from making another bad comedy sequel: Three Men and a Little Lady, after the surprise hit Three Men and a Baby. The original: $167 million. The sequel: $71 million.

Then there’s the ill-conceived Blues Brothers 2000, which came two decades after the original and co-star John Belushi’s death. John Goodman took over the Belushi role, but audiences had little desire to see that. The original: $57 million. The sequel: $14 million.

Two forgettable sequels were made to the 1986 surprise hit Crocodile Dundee. A bad sequel to 1984’s Revenge of the Nerds was released in 1987.

And there’s my favorite comedy of all time: 1980’s Airplane! It’s sequel came and went two years later. I’ve seen Airplane! countless times. I’ve seen the second installment exactly once and it pales in comparison. Original: $83 million. Sequel: $27 million.

Probably the most anticipated sequel to an 80s comedy is 1989’s Ghostbusters 2, following up the 1984 smash hit. The first one is a total classic. The sequel is just OK. Original: $229 million. Sequel: $112 million.

Moving on to the 1990s, we have plenty of examples too. How about City Slickers II: The Legend of Curly’s Gold, 1994’s follow-up to the 1991 hit. That unmemorable experience actually used the grand old soap opera tactic of bringing Jack Palance’s character back because… he had a twin brother no one knew about! Lame. So is the movie. Original: $124 million. Sequel: $43 million.

Two 1993 sequels to 1992 comedies tried and failed to capitalize on the original’s successes: Wayne’s World 2 and Sister Act 2: Back in the Habbit. 1995’s Father of the Bride Part II actually made good money, but it fails to match the first. Also, 1991’s Naked Gun 2 1/2: The Smell of Fear and 1994’s Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult performed decently, but couldn’t come close to the quality of the 1988 original.

Our previous decade brought us more comedy sequel disappointment: anyone think Legally Blonde 2 was better than the first? It did, however, gross only slightly less than the first ($96 million-$90 million). Or how about 2002’s mediocre Men in Black II, which was no match for the 1997 original (for that matter, MIB3 was underwhelming too). Or Steve Martin’s second Pink Panther flick… even though the first was nothing great either. Or the second Nutty Professor installment. Or the return of Martin Lawrence’s Big Momma… twice. Or 2002’s Analyze That, the sequel to Analyze This. That one made $32 million or $74 million less than the first. Also, 2001’s American Pie 2 and 2003’s American Wedding didn’t live up to the original, though both had their moments, I’ll admit.

As mentioned earlier, we do see exceptions from time to time. 1964’s A Shot in the Dark is actually the second Peter Sellers-Pink Panther movie and it’s widely considered the best. Meet the Fockers became the highest grossing comedy of all time upon its release, though I maintain it’s not near as good as Meet the Parents. And Little Fockers… ugh. By the same token, The Hangover sequel did enormous box office, though I basically thought it was a carbon copy of the original. The three sequels to Scary Movie all had some funny stuff in them too. The first Austin Powers is the funniest, though I think both sequels were solid.

Other comedy sequels that many believe are better or at least almost as good as the original: 1993’s Hot Shots: Part Deux. 1991’s Bill&Ted’s Bogus Journey, and 2006’s Clerks II. Also, many consider 1993’s Addams Family Values to be an improvement on the 1991 original.

Finally, there’s the the Good, the Bad, and the Just OK sequels that represent the Vacation movies. The 1983 original is one of the funniest films of all time. There were three sequels. The Good is obviously 1989’s Christmas Vacation. Very good, as a matter of fact.

The Bad is 1997’s embarrassing Vegas Vacation.

The Just OK is the first sequel, 1985’s European Vacation.

This all leads to us to wonder what category the upcoming sequels to Anchorman, Ted, and the third Hangover will fall under. And we’re going to get a proper Dumb and Dumber sequel, with Carrey and Jeff Daniels back. And this weekend, we’ll have the “sort of” sequel to Knocked Up – This is 40.

We can all hope and, in particular, I can’t wait to see Ron Burgundy, Brick, Champ, and Brian back in action. You may want to temper your expectations though, because generally the history of comedy sequels has been… well, sucky.

The State of the Oscar Race

Since the last time I blogged Oscar predictions, a number of very significant events have taken place: the Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild nominations are out. Most critics groups have bestowed their awards. Many prominent individual critics have started releasing their “Best Of” lists of the year.

The Oscar race has taken shape. We won’t know until next month what will be nominated, but it certainly felt like time to update my predictions for what will be nominated. Here goes in the six major categories. What I will do in this post is break down my predictions by “Locks”, “Strong Possibility”, “Possible”, and “Dark Horse” and indicate my predicted nominees in bold. I will give a number for each to indicate how strongly I feel its nomination is (1 being the highest and so forth). This does not necessarily indicate what I think will win (I could rank something #1 on nomination chances and not believe it ultimately will take home the golden guy). I will likely make just one more round of nomination predictions (maybe two) and then we will see a blog post in the future after nominations are out on what I think will win. Here we go:

Best Picture

Locks

1. Lincoln

2. Argo

3. Zero Dark Thirty

4. Les Miserables

Strong Possibility

5. Silver Linings Playbook

6. Life of Pi

7. Amour

Possible

8. The Master

9. Beasts of the Southern Wild

10. Django Unchained

11. Moonrise Kingdom

12. The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel

Dark Horse

13. Flight

14. The Impossible

15. Skyfall

Breakdown: At this point, I believe the chances of eight to ten nominees is much more likely than not. I have The Master and Beasts of the Southern Wild hanging by a thread. The French film Amour seems to have just enough traction to be in, though that too is tentative. The real threat to get in is Django Unchained, which is being called one of Tarantino’s best. It was only three years ago that Inglourious Basterds was nominated. I’m still not quite ready to predict it gets a nomination, but I’m awfully close. Moonrise Kingdom and The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel have real shots too. For the moment, the nine in bold make the cut.

Best Director

Locks

1. Steven Spielberg, Lincoln

2. Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty

3. Ben Affleck, Argo

Strong Possibilities

4. Ang Lee, Life of Pi

5. Tom Hooper, Les Miserables

6. David O. Russell, Silver Linings Playbook

7. Michael Haneke, Amour

Possible

8. Quentin Tarantino, Django Unchained

Dark Horse

9. Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master

10. Wes Anderson, Moonrise Kingdom

11. Benh Zietlin, Beasts of the Southern Wild

Breakdown: If my estimation, we have eight directors fighting it out for five slots. Spielberg, Bigelow, and Affleck are in. Then it gets tricky. I have a hard time not seeing Ang Lee nominated for Life of Pi, which is being praised mostly for its amazing direction. Also, Les Miserables is a BIG film and I think Hooper will get recognized for it. Still, Russell, Haneke, and Tarantino are real possibilities. For now though, I think they’re on the outside looking in.

Best Actor

Locks

1. Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln

Strong Possibilities

2. John Hawkes, The Sessions

3. Denzel Washington, Flight

4. Bradley Cooper, Silver Linings Playbook

5. Joaquin Phoenix, The Master

6. Hugh Jackman, Les Miserables

Possible

7. Richard Gere, Arbitrage

8. Jean-Louis Trintignant, Amour

Dark Horse

9. Anthony Hopkins, Hitchcock

Breakdown: Everyone knows Day-Lewis is getting nominated. However, he is the only one I feel comfortable calling a lock. Why? Because this genuinely looks like a VERY strong six man race and only five can be nominated. I have gone back and forth on who gets left out and right now it’s Hugh Jackman without the musical chair. Everyone else (Hawkes, Washington, Cooper, Phoenix) are also vulnerable to find themselves standing. For this category, I will give an early spoiler alert: that #1 slot could very well translate in who I pick to win eventually.

Best Actress

Locks

1. Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook

2. Jessica Chastain, Zero Dark Thirty

Strong Possibilities

3. Emmanuelle Riva, Amour

4. Marion Cotillard, Rust and Bone

5. Quvenzhane Wallis, Beasts of the Southern Wild

6. Naomi Watts, The Impossible

7. Rachel Weisz, The Deep Blue Sea

8. Helen Mirren, Hitchcock

Breakdown: This race looks like it’s coming down to Lawrence and Chastain competing for the gold. And I think 85 year old French actress Riva has gotten enough kudos that she’s in. After that, the last two slots are a real battle for actresses listed 4-8, but today I give the edge to Cotillard and Wallis.

Best Supporting Actor

Locks

1. Tommy Lee Jones, Lincoln

2. Philip Seymour Hoffman, The Master

Strong Possibilities

3. Alan Arkin, Argo

4. Robert De Niro, Silver Linings Playbook

5. Leonardo DiCaprio, Django Unchained

6. Eddie Redmayne, Les Miserables

Possible

7. Javier Bardem, Skyfall

8. Matthew McConaughey, Magic Mike

9. Christoph Waltz, Django Unchained

10. Dwight Henry, Beasts of the Southern Wild

Dark Horse

11. John Goodman, Argo or Flight

12. Ewan McGregor, The Impossible

13. Samuel L. Jackson, Django Unchained

Breakdown: This is a bigger list because I think there’s a legitimate chance we see a surprise nominee, like Bardem or McConaughey or Henry. For now, these predictions are the same they were a month ago though.

Best Supporting Actress

Locks

1. Anne Hathaway, Les Miserables

Strong Possibilities

2. Sally Field, Lincoln

3. Helen Hunt, The Sessions

4. Maggie Smith, The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel

Possible

5. Amy Adams, The Master

6. Nicole Kidman, The Paperboy

7. Ann Dowd, Compliance

7. Samantha Barks, Les Miserables

8. Kelly Reilly, Flight

9. Judi Dench, Skyfall

10. Jacki Weaver, Silver Linings Playbook

Breakdown: Hathaway is definitely the front runner, but I believe real upset possibilities exist with Field or Smith or maybe Hunt. The fifth slot is tricky. I’m predicting Adams gets in, but Kidman has gained major momentum when her role in the critically panned and little seen film The Paperboy got SAG and Globe nominations and Barks and Dowd are certainly possible.

So there you have it, my blog reading friends! My current predictions. I’ll be back for another round soon enough.

The Rolling Stones

Well, it took me all of two months to break my promise of only writing about movies on this here blog of mine. Oh well. I can’t help it. I’ve been thinking about the greatest rock and roll band of all time today, The Rolling Stones.

As any of you who see my Facebook posts may be aware, my parents saw The Stones in concert last night in Newark, New Jersey. I ordered the concert on pay per view so I could watch along with them and it’s unbelievable how those four lads can still get it done after FIFTY years. They were joined by Bruce Springsteen, Lady Gaga, the Black Keys, and John Mayer in the show, but Mick, Keith, Bill, and Charlie were the attraction.

Let’s begin with the obvious: Mick Jagger is the greatest frontman of all time. Case closed. Any questions? His moves have inspired a hit song. There’s no one like him and if you could bottle whatever “it” is that Mick has, we’d all drink it.

More importantly, the Stones have been able to do something maybe no other band has done – take five decades of musical genres and master them, from rock to blues to R&B to country to disco to pop to ballads and on and on. That’s another thing that makes them special. Other bands have come and gone, but the Stones have stuck around, stayed with the times, and now are deservedly considered the best ever to do it. I love The Beatles. I love Led Zeppelin. I love The Doors. But The Stones… they’re just something else and their longevity may have a lot to do with it.

This longevity is something that struck me last night as I watched their incredible concert. They did an amazing job covering many in their extensive catalog of hits: “Get Off My Cloud”. “It’s Only Rock and Roll”. “Paint It Black”. “Gimme Shelter”. “Wild Horses”. “Miss You”. “Honkytonk Woman”. “Midnight Rambler”. “Start Me Up”. “Tumbling Dice”. “Brown Sugar”. “Sympathy for the Devil”. “You Can’t Always Get What You Want”. “Jumpin Jack Flash”. “Satisfaction”. I don’t know about you, but just reading that list of songs makes me smile.

And, what’s even more astonishing is the number of songs that they COULD have played and the crowd still would’ve gone crazy. We’re talking dozens more songs. That’s what 50 amazing years in music provides to the fans. That’s why it takes seven minutes for The Rolling Stones to sell out a concert.

Just so I’m “fair” in keeping this a “movie blog”… um, Martin Scorsese LOVES to use R.S. songs in his movies, particularly “Gimme Shelter”. And Mick Jagger had the unfortunate distinction of starring in the really bad 1992 sci-fi dud Freejack with Emilio Estevez and Anthony Hopkins.

Back to the music. If reading that incredible list of tracks made you smile, here’s 12 more personal favorites of mine that weren’t played last night.

From the 1966 album Aftermath, “Under My Thumb”

From the 1967 album Between the Buttons, “Ruby Tuesday”

From the 1971 album Sticky Fingers, “Bitch”

From the 1973 album Goats Head Soup, “Angie”

From the 1976 album Black and Blue, “Fool to Cry”

From the 1978 album Some Girls, “Beast of Burden”

From that same album, “Shattered”

From the 1980 album Emotional Rescue, the title track

From the 1981 album Tattoo You, “Waiting on a Friend”

From the 1986 album Dirty Work, “Harlem Shuffle”

From the 1989 album Steel Wheels, “Mixed Emotions”

From the 1997 album Bridges to Babylon, “Anybody Seen My Baby”

 

Box Office Results: December 14-16

It was the weekend for one debut and one debut only at the box office this weekend, Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit. There was little doubt it would set the all-time December opening weekend, which had been held by 2007’s I Am Legend.

The Hobbit broke that record, earning $84.8 million this weekend and earning a great “A” CinemaScore grade from audiences. Sooooo… what was my prediction? $84.8 million. I can’t believe it either, quite frankly. If you don’t believe me, here’s the link from Thursday:

https://toddmthatcher.wordpress.com/2012/12/13/box-office-predictions-dec-14-16-the-hobbit-arrives/

The film will likely hold that December record one exactly one year, when the second Hobbit installment opens next Christmas season. All I know is you can bet money on opening weekends and I’m kicking myself for not doing so.

As for the other films, Rise of the Guardians was second with $7.4 million, slightly above my $6.9 projection. Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln held up better than expected, partly due to its big number of Golden Globe nominations. It earned $7.2 million, well past my $5.8M projection for third. Skyfall dropped to fourth with $7 million, higher than my $6.2M prediction. Life of Pi was fifth with $5.4 million, just below my $5.5M projection and The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 earned $5.2 million for sixth, slightly above my $4.9M projection.

Check back Thursday for next weekend’s projections, where a host of new titles will try to compete with Hobbit‘s second frame, including the Tom Cruise action thriller Jack Reacher, Judd Apatow’s comedy This is 40, the Seth Rogen/Barbara Streisand comedy The Guilt Trip, and Disney’s 3D re-release of Monsters Inc. 

Box Office Predictions (Dec 14-16): The Hobbit Arrives

After two very quiet weeks at the box office where Thanksgiving leftovers dominated and two others films (Killing Them Softly and Playing for Keeps) came and went, the Christmas movie season officially gets underway with the release of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.

Director Peter Jackson kicks off his new trilogy of films based on Tolkien with one of the most eagerly anticipated titles of 2012. It will almost surely make more money this weekend than the rest of Top Ten combined. But how big is the question? It’s the director of the Lord of the Rings movies returning to Middle Earth. It’s been heavily hyped. On the flip side, it is not receiving quite the critical acclaim or awards buzz of Jackson’s first trilogy.  Not to say that’ll keep the fans away because it won’t, but it may not open on the higher ends of expectations, which would be be over $100 million this weekend. The last Rings saga grossed $72 million in its inaugural weekend in 2003 and ticket prices have jumped since then, so it’s reasonable to expect Hobbit will open bigger. With a film this anticipated, anything less than $75 million would likely be a considerable disappointment. For whatever reason though, I am having a tough time envisioning it doing over $100 million (but I could be way wrong on this one).

Meanwhile, the Turkey Day leftovers will slide between 30-50% most likely. This weekend really is all about The Hobbit though. No studio dared to schedule competition against it. And with that, my predictions for the weekend:

1. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Predicted Gross: $84.8 million

2. Rise of the Guardians

Predicted Gross: $6.9 million (representing a drop of 34%)

3. Skyfall

Predicted Gross: $6.2 million (representing a drop of 43%)

4. Lincoln

Predicted Gross: $5.8 million (representing a drop of 35%)

5. Life of Pi

Predicted Gross: $5.5 million (representing a drop of 34%)

6. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2

Predicted Gross: $4.9 million (representing a drop of 49%)

Sunday, we will see how right or wrong I am about that little hobbit. Stay tuned!

Oscar History: 1994

Maybe more than any other year I can think of, 1994 stands as a year in Oscar history where hindsight has definitely changed public opinion on the Best Picture winner. There’s been plenty of examples: Rocky over Taxi DriverOrdinary People over Raging BullAnnie Hall over Star WarsChariots of Fire over Raiders of the Lost ArkGandhi over E.T.Dances with Wolves over GoodFellas?

1994 is unique because there’s not one, but two movies that have grown in stature over that year’s winner. In the summer of 1994, a movie based on a fairly unknown novel came out of nowhere to become a smash hit that deeply connected with audiences: Robert Zemeckis’s Forrest Gump, starring Tom Hanks, Gary Sinise, Robin Wright Penn, and Sally Field. The movie was a phenomenon, becoming one of the highest grossing films of all time and second only that year to Disney’s The Lion King. The Academy would reward Gump with Best Picture, Director, and would give Hanks his second Best Actor win in a row, after winning for 1993’s Philadelphia. Hanks would become only the second actor in Oscar history, after Spencer Tracy, to achieve that historic distinction.

I’m a huge fan of the movie just like everyone else and in most years, Gump would be looked back at as a highly deserving winner. However, 1994 was a milestone year for a couple of other films.

First, Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction. As you may have noticed, I’m a huge fan of Quentin Tarantino and Pulp is now seen as possibly the most important and influential movie of the past 25 years. It certainly is by me. Pulp was a cultural phenomenon upon its release and its reputation has only grown since.

Then there’s that other movie: Frank Darabont’s The Shawshank Redemption. Many may not be aware, but Shawshank actually didn’t perform very well at the box office upon its release. It was critically acclaimed, but audiences didn’t respond right away. Once it reached video shelves, it took on a life of its own when audiences discovered just how wonderful it is. This all culminated a few years ago when Shawshank became the #1 ranked film on IMDB.com, over even The Godfather. It’s hard to find anyone nowadays who doesn’t absolutely adore Shawshank. In 1994, however, while it did get nominated, it wasn’t considered a real contender to win.

I suspect many a film buff, including this one, would certainly rank Pulp and Shawshank above Gump. The other two pictures nominated included an expected one, Robert Redford’s solid Quiz Show, about the game show scandals of the 1950s and a surprise, the British romantic comedy Four Weddings and a Funeral, starring Hugh Grant and Andie McDowell. Both are good movies that had no chance of winning considering the competition.

As already mentioned, Zemeckis would win the Director award for Gump, beating out Woody Allen for Bullets Over Broadway, Redford for Quiz Show, Tarantino for Pulp, and Kryzsztof Kieslowski for the foreign film Red. As further evidence of Shawshank not being regarded as highly as it is now, director Darabont wasn’t even nominated.

Gump love would lead Hanks to that second win in a row. Both Morgan Freeman for Shawshank and John Travolta for Pulp were nominees, along with Paul Newman for Nobody’s Fool and Nigel Hawthorne for The Madness of King George. In hindsight, seems like room should have been made Tim Robbins work in Shawshank as well.

Jessica Lange would win Best Actress for the little-seen indie film Blue Sky, edging out Jodie Foster in Nell, Winona Ryder in Little Women, Miranda Richardson in Tom and Viv, and Susan Sarandon in The Client (only nominee for an actor based on a John Grisham novel – fun fact!).

Veteran actor Martin Landau would take Supporting Actor for his great performance as monster movie icon Bela Lugosi in Tim Burton’s Ed Wood. The other nominees: Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp, Paul Scofield in Quiz Show, Gary Sinise in Gump, and Chazz Palminiteri in Bullets Over Broadway. Again, with the Shawshank angle, Bob Gunton’s work as the sadistic warden should have been recognized in this category.

Dianne Wiest would win Supporting Actress for Bullets Over Broadway, beating out Jennifer Tilly for that same film, Helen Mirren in The Madness of King George, Uma Thurman in Pulp, and Rosemary Harris for Tom and Viv. Surprisingly, neither Sally Field or Robin Wright Penn were recognized for Gump. I would also make a case for Kirsten Dunst for her breakthrough performance in Interview with the Vampire.

What else got left out? Not a whole lot, honestly. You could certainly make the case that Disney’s Lion King is one of their better animated features and could have received a Picture nomination. The Academy hardly ever recognizes comedic brilliance, so Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels hilarious work in Dumb and Dumber was the longest of long shots.

More than anything, 1994 in Oscar history will be remembered as a year where two of the most important movies of the last quarter century were nominated… and neither won.

Box Office Results: December 7-9

No major surprises this weekend with the box office results, but most films did better than my predictions and the dropoffs from last weekend were not as high as I anticipated.

Skyfall pulled off the rare feat of returning to the #1 spot in its fifth weekend after Twilight had been on top for the past three weeks. The all-time highest Bond grosser added another $11 million to its coffers, considerably higher than my meager $8.5M prediction.

Rise of the Guardians had the lowest drop-off at only 21%, putting it up to #2 with $10.5 million, higher than my $7.8M forecast.

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 ended its box office reign and dropped to third with $9.2 million, a million higher than my $8.2 million prediction.

Lincoln was fourth with $9.1M (I low balled with $7.4M) and Life of Pi was fifth with $8.3M (higher than my $7.3M forecast).

The critically panned Gerard Butler romantic comedy with come in sixth, as I predicted, with a disappointing $6 million. I gave it a little too much credit and predicted $7 million.

Predictions for next weekend will be up Thursday, when Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit invades theaters. Spoiler alert: I’m going to predict it opens at #1.

Movie Perfection: Quentin Tarantino

I’ve written three blog posts in my “Movie Perfection” series where I focus on scenes in movies that represent, in my mind, the best that films can be: the finale of Seven, the sing-along to “Tiny Dancer” in Almost Famous, and the montage set to beautiful music of Carl and Ellie growing old together in Disney’s Up.

This next entry into Movie Perfection is not about a scene. It’s about a person.

Quentin Tarantino.

Just looking at his name floods my memory with indelible scenes from his movies. Snippets of his dialogue. Performances from his films.

He’s been at it for 20 years now. There is probably no blog post I could write that properly expresses my love and appreciation for his work. I’ll try anyway.

Reservoir Dogs.  Pulp Fiction.  Jackie Brown.  Kill Bill – Volume 1.  Kill Bill – Volume 2.  Grindhouse.  Inglourious Basterds.  

In my very first blog post (way back in October 2012) I described the first time I saw Reservoir Dogs and fell in love immediately with the movie. That was in 1993 (it was released theatrically in limited form in 1992). This led me to anticipate 1994’s Pulp Fiction in a way I’d never anticipated a movie before or since. And when I did see Pulp in the theater in October 1994 on opening weekend, I’d never had a film experience like that before… and haven’t since. My expectations for that film were about as high as movie expectations can be… and Pulp Fiction exceeded them. I would see it in the theater eight times and countless times more on VHS and DVD.

These expectations were at the level they were because of the brilliance of Reservoir Dogs.    This movie was a total revelation to me. I’ve seen it many, many times. Looking back now, maybe the most amazing thing about is that it’s about a robbery. And, as an audience, we never see the robbery. We see the before and after of the robbery. Of course, the film is shot out of order, which is pretty much a staple of Tarantino. He doesn’t follow the linear pattern that 99% of films follow and a lot of directors have copied that since, but not near to effect that Quentin does it.

A regular movie would’ve been about the robbery. Reservoir Dogs is about what the characters talk about in a diner before the robbery, which includes the meaning of Madonna’s song “Like A Virgin” and arguments about why people should tip or not tip waitresses. All handled with dialogue that only Tarantino can do. Brilliant writing.

Reservoir Dogs uses the obvious formula of one of the robbers being an undercover cop. A regular movie would’ve made the undercover cop the focal point and used that character as the hero stopping this horrible robbery. Not Reservoir Dogs. Nothing is obvious when Tarantino is writing the film. Instead, we see a brilliant sequence where the undercover cop, played by Tim Roth, has to rehearse telling a story to the other robbers that will convince them he’s one of them. The story involves having drugs on him and walking into a bathroom where some law enforcement officers and a drug-sniffing dog just happen to be. It’s an incredibly well-done and exciting sequence that has you on the edge of your seat and we know the whole time it’s completely made up. Only Quentin.

Pulp Fiction continues those themes in many ways. When John Travolta and Sam Jackson are on their way to find that suitcase and kill the people who stole it, the preceding scene isn’t about them discussing how to handle those guys. It’s them talking about Travolta’s character Vincent being in Europe and what they call a Big Mac there. And a Whopper. But, as we all know, Vincent didn’t go into a Burger King, so he doesn’t know. And then as they prepare to enter the thieves apartment, it turns into a discussion on whether it’s appropriate to give another man’s wife a foot massage. This is after they discuss that certain TV shows that are filmed never become shows because the pilots don’t get picked up.

The point is this: Tarantino revolutionized dialogue in movies. His writing doesn’t serve the  idea of simply moving the plot along. Tarantino’s scenes take the bold step of having interesting characters talk like people actually talk from time to time. About movies and television. About food. About how people tip waitresses. About making up stories to impress people you need to impress. He’s one of the first writers that had his characters make movie references. Sounds normal now, but Tarantino really made that acceptable. Before him (for the most part), if you watched a movie, the writers would have you believe none of their characters had ever watched another film before and didn’t have the film knowledge to reference them. Tarantino’s characters talk about other movies and TV shows.  This is likely because, if you read anything about him, Tarantino is described as a walking encyclopedia of film history. He’s seen everything. He LOVES movies.

And I think that’s why people who LOVE movies so much LOVE Tarantino. He doesn’t hesitate to borrow from other films and pay homage to other directors. And when he does, he’s not ripping them off. He’s putting his own spin on their work with the kind of amazing dialogue that no one else seems capable of writing. The fact that Reservoir Dogs was an indie hit and then Pulp Fiction became a phenomenon two years later has given Tarantino the ability to do whatever he wants. Few directors get the kind of creative freedom he does and he uses it to the max.

No one casts movie like Tarantino and how he does that has been revolutionary. His deep knowledge of movies and actors makes him cast unconventional choices for roles and it’s resurrected many a career and started others. The most obvious example is John Travolta, whose career as an A list actor had been dormant for over a decade. From the early 80s to the mid 90s, Travolta’s biggest contribution to film had been a trilogy of talking baby movies. Tarantino credited Travolta’s great performance in 1981’s Brian De Palma thriller Blow Out as his inspiration for casting him as Vincent Vega in Pulp and it catapulted him back to A list territory.

It’s not just Travolta. He turned Samuel L. Jackson from a character actor to a leading man. He resurrected the career of 70s blaxpoitation star Pam Grier by giving her the title role in Jackie Brown. He directed longtime B movie actor Robert Forster to an Oscar nomination in that same film. The same can be said for David Carradine, the late Kung Fu actor who gave the performance of his career in the Kill Bill movies. He gave Kurt Russell one of his best roles in Grindhouse. He directed little known European actor Christoph Waltz to an Oscar win in Inglourious Basterds. And there’s Tim Roth. And Michael Madsen. And Uma Thurman. And Ving Rhames. And Michael Fassbender. And Christopher Walken’s brilliant scene in Pulp. And B movie actor Lawrence Tierney chewing up the scenery in Reservoir. And Steve Buscemi. Get the idea?

No one uses music as effectively as Quentin does in movies. The examples are many, from the Reservoir Dogs walking to “Little Green Bag” by the George Baker Selection to the ear-slicing scene in that movie played to “Stuck in the Middle with You” by Stealers Wheel. There’s “Misirlou” by surf guitarist Dick Dale over the opening credits to Pulp Fiction. Travolta and Uma Thurman dancing to Chuck Berry’s “You Never Can Tell”.  Bruce Willis singing along in his car to “Flowers on the Wall” by the Statler Bros. Samuel L. Jackson executing Chris Tucker’s character to the tune of “Strawberry Letter 23” by the Brothers Johnson in Jackie Brown. Jackie singing along to “Across 110th Street” by Bobby Womack in her car at the film’s close. The characters of Jackie and Forster’s bail bondsman bonding to “Didn’t I Blow Your Mind (This Time)” by the Delfonics. Nancy Sinatra’s “Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down)” over the credits to Kill Bill Volume 1. The brilliant use of Ennio Morricone’s Western scores in both Bill features. Kurt Russell killing the four girls in the car crash to the tune of “Hold Tight” by Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mich & Tich in Grindhouse. And the preparation of Hitler’s visit to the movie theater as David Bowie’s “Cat People (Putting Out Fire)” plays in Basterds. Much like his encyclopedic mind with movies, Tarantino’s the same way with music and he makes amazing choices that cause his soundtracks to be must-owns, just like his films.

Beyond the movies he’s directed, he wrote the screenplays for 1993’s fantastic True Romance, which contains one of the best scenes in the last 20 years with between Christopher Walken and Dennis Hopper.  And there’s 1996’s From Dusk Til Dawn, which is a helluva fun crime thriller/vampire flick.

I could continue to go on and on. The bottom line is this: I could pick from countless scenes in his films. Countless lines of brilliant dialogue. Countless amazing uses of music. Countless career-best performances that he’s directed his actors to.

I won’t. Quentin Tarantino is Movie Perfection. He’s the most important and influential director of the past two decades. People who truly love movies in a deep way love Tarantino. And that’s because he deeply loves movies, has studied them, and figured out a way to make them better than anyone else. And with that – enjoy the videos!

 

The Other Comic Book Movies

I don’t know about you, but when I think about movies based on comic books or graphic novels, I quickly think of those ending in the word “Man” or “Men” be it Super, Bat, Spider, Iron, X, or Watch.

The comic book movie is a genre mostly associated with the last 35 years, starting in 1978 with the release of Superman with Christopher Reeve, Marlon Brando, and Gene Hackman. This was really the first-time a comic book property got the proper big-screen treatment, with a well-known director (Richard Donner, coming off 1976’s The Omen) and big stars. The film would not, however, open the floodgates to other comic book properties except for its own sequels (which got continually worse with each entry).

In 1989, the next massive comic book adaptation would come: Tim Burton’s Batman, starring Jack Nicholson, Michael Keaton, and Kim Basinger… and a funky soundtrack from Prince. For those who weren’t born or were too young, Batman was unquestionably one of the most anticipated movies of all time upon its release. The marketing team behind the film in particular did an amazing job with its promotion. There were kids getting the Batman signal shaved into the backs of their head, for goodness sake. Batman would spawn three sequels, like Superman. And they also got pretty bad (culminating with the embarrassing Batman and Robin in 1997).

It really wasn’t until 2000 with the release of Bryan Singer’s X-Men that the studios realized that there were a LOT of comic book properties that could made into films. One could make the argument that 1998’s Blade really started the trend.

Either way, in the last twelve years, we’ve seen a ton of comic book movies. Most of them were successful: the X-Men series, the Spiderman series, Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy, Iron Man and its sequel, The Avengers, Thor, Captain America, and Hellboy and its sequel. Some were met with mixed results: Watchmen, Daredevil, Ghost Rider, the Fantastic Four movies, and Hulk and The Incredible Hulk all performed pretty well at the box office, but were met with mixed critical and audience reaction. And there was the occasional bomb: Green Hornet with Ryan Reynolds. From a box office standpoint, if you look at the Top 50 Movie Openings of All Time, nearly a fourth (12) are based on comic books or graphic novels.

The movies mentioned above are all examples of ones that may immediately spring to mind if I say “comic book movie”. But if you take a closer look, there are several movies based on either comic books or graphic novels that you might not know were. Here’s some examples:

2002’s Road to Perdition, with Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, Jude Law, and Daniel Craig, is based on a graphic novel.

So is 2001’s From Hell, starring Johnny Depp which focuses on the hunt for Jack the Ripper.

How about 2008’s Wanted with Angelina Jolie and James McAvoy? It is too.

I certainly wouldn’t have known David Cronenberg’s top-notch thriller A History of Violence comes from a graphic novel.

And here’s two Bruce Willis flicks based on comic book/graphic novel properties: 2009’s Surrogates and 2010’s Red.

Going back quite a bit further, 1985’s guilty pleasure comedy Weird Science comes from the pages of a comic book.

So does the notoriously bad 1986 film Howard the Duck.

Others include 2007’s hit 300, the successful Men in Black films, Jean Claudde Van Damme’s 1994 action flick Timecop, and last year’s Cowboys and Aliens. 

It’s clear to see the influence of comic books and graphic novels on film has been much more than heroes in capes, even though that’s what we think of first.

Box Office Predictions: Weekend of December 7-9

In what is sure to be another very slow weekend at the box office (just like last weekend’s post Thanksgiving frame), there is only one new entry opening: the romantic comedy Playing for Keeps, starring Gerard Butler. The film, quite honestly, looks indistinguishable from most other bad romantic comedies and it sits at precisely 0% on RottenTomatoes. Wow. Do not expect this one to do much business.

Or much of anything else for that matter. The top five films from last weekend could very likely be the top five again. Do not expect any of them to have the percentage drop-off they had last weekend, when most films tumble from the huge Thanksgiving frame. It appears that those movies may be tightly bunched together with what they make during this slow weekend, which makes it somewhat interesting to predict what #1 will be.

Next weekend is when the real Christmas box office battles heat up, with The Hobbit opening and a number of other high-profile flicks to follow right before Christmas or on the holiday. Until then, it’s still leftovers and an awful looking new rom-com.

With that, here’s my official predictions for the close race:

1. Skyfall

Predicted Gross: $8.5 million (representing a drop of 49%)

2. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2

Predicted Gross: $8.2 million (representing a drop of 54%)

3. Rise of the Guardians

Predicted Gross: $7.8 million (representing a drop of 42%)

4. Lincoln

Predicted Gross: $7.4 million (representing a drop of 45%)

5. Life of Pi

Predicted Gross: $7.3 million (representing a drop of 40%)

6. Playing for Keeps

Predicted Gross: $7 million

Official results will come Sunday.